>NEW: Info to the keyword with | >discuss | >create link 
on Feb 23rd 2004, 03:36:34, larry wrote the following about

with

adjascent to, connected to, along side of, in connection to, have to do with,
Meandering bullshit that only makes me see how utterly contemptuous my thought processes are most of the time.
To completely conjugate, or relate to such a word with such purpose, shows a complete narsacism,(sp) on my part. I am so into myself that I can only think about what I think, as I think, when I think, how I think. Self absorbed beyond belief.
How many people can talk for hours about one simple word with such little information passing between the people involved.



   user rating: +1
Do not try to answer or comment the text you see above. Nobody will see the things you refer to. Instead, write an atomic text about »with«!

Your name:
Your Associativity to »with«:
Do NOT enter anything here:
Do NOT change this input field:
 Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »with« | FAQ | Home Page 
0.0015 (0.0005, 0.0004) sek. –– 46886386