>NEW: Info to the keyword EnrichTheAssoziationsBlaster | >discuss | >create link 
on Mar 28th 2003, 13:39:05, zk wrote the following about

EnrichTheAssoziationsBlaster

Is there a record of when or why the »a« was dropped
from »encyclopaedia«? I do not wish to initiate a discussion
on the evoloution or usage of language, but there seems to
be an overbearing anarchism at play. If, as I suspect, the less adept
are having such an influence-is this website helpful or
unhelpful and, if either, who for? Surely only the adept will
know or care, while those who do not understand will see
a cause that they (despite not understanding it) are prepared
to follow. As long as arrogant twats like me
remain I suppose we'll understand each other. Have I had
too much to drink?
This shows signs of paranoia and insecurity mixed with
megolamaniacal tendencies. The point is I know the answers
to all thse questions and it really isn't important anyway
just interesting and I am only talking to myself. See what
you've started? What was the keyword anyway?



   user rating: /
Do not try to answer or comment the text you see above. Nobody will see the things you refer to. Instead, write an atomic text about »EnrichTheAssoziationsBlaster«!

Your name:
Your Associativity to »EnrichTheAssoziationsBlaster«:
Do NOT enter anything here:
Do NOT change this input field:
 Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »EnrichTheAssoziationsBlaster« | FAQ | Home Page 
0.0016 (0.0005, 0.0005) sek. –– 76617238