calloway wrote on Jan 9th 2001, 00:22:43 about
| Amount of texts to »is« | 78, and there are 68 texts (87.18%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
| Average lenght of texts | 54 Characters |
| Average Rating | 2.756 points, 18 Not rated texts |
| First text | on May 30th 2000, 12:04:20 wrote pip about is |
| Latest text | on Sep 29th 2015, 04:14:15 wrote Ned Winfrey about is |
| Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 18) |
on Apr 23rd 2002, 05:29:30 wrote
on Oct 4th 2005, 07:51:55 wrote
on Mar 9th 2005, 11:00:53 wrote |
Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »Is«
tim wrote on Feb 6th 2001, 23:15:33 about
is
Rating: 152 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyA goldfish can kill a gorilla, all it needs is the element of surprise.
Ryan wrote on Aug 11th 2004, 05:21:38 about
is
Rating: 13 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
Jack wrote on Nov 6th 2003, 05:46:09 about
is
Rating: 7 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
ism wrote on Oct 20th 2000, 10:03:23 about
is
Rating: 4 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
Peridot wrote on Sep 9th 2000, 07:02:12 about
is
Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyi occasionally choose is to find something as short or as meaningless as the word. same as the and a
annonomous wrote on May 24th 2003, 03:28:55 about
is
Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyis cannot be a statement just by itself. It needs to have a sentence, or it is not proper grammar. If it is not proper grammar, other people will not understand you. If they cannot understand you, what is the point of writing? THen you can just talk on the phone and stuff. Or you can use M S N M e s s e n g e r!
El Boo wrote on Apr 8th 2005, 17:09:53 about
is
Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
Most people didn't understand what Bill Clinton meant when he said »that depends on what the definition of 'is' is.« The question placed was »Is there a sexual relationship...«
Clinton had to be careful. If he answered »no,« they could get him on the fact that there had been a relationship in the past, even though there may not now »be« a relationship.
If »is« means »currently exists« the answer might have been no, but if you remove the temporal element it could possibly have been yes.
When you're being questioned under oath, you have to be sure of your definitions, otherwise you may later be accused of lying or you might admit something you had no intention of admitting.
| Some random keywords |
Darwin
sin
else
BobTheBilder
MI5
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Asbach
Türkei
oft
ThomasMann
Ralf-Schumacher-ist-schwul-und-treibts-mit-Etienne
Büchereiverlängern
Arschlochmittwoch
|