Ryan wrote on Aug 11th 2004, 05:21:38 about
| Amount of texts to »is« | 78, and there are 68 texts (87.18%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
| Average lenght of texts | 54 Characters |
| Average Rating | 2.756 points, 18 Not rated texts |
| First text | on May 30th 2000, 12:04:20 wrote pip about is |
| Latest text | on Sep 29th 2015, 04:14:15 wrote Ned Winfrey about is |
| Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 18) |
on Feb 9th 2005, 20:00:23 wrote
on Aug 4th 2000, 05:39:55 wrote
on Dec 18th 2000, 01:08:33 wrote |
Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »Is«
calloway wrote on Jan 9th 2001, 00:22:43 about
is
Rating: 12 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
tim wrote on Feb 6th 2001, 23:15:33 about
is
Rating: 152 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyA goldfish can kill a gorilla, all it needs is the element of surprise.
ike wrote on Sep 13th 2000, 06:12:41 about
is
Rating: 6 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
is it just my imagination, or is there
not a lot to say about the third person
singular form of the verb to be?
tim wrote on Feb 6th 2001, 23:25:29 about
is
Rating: 6 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyGeography is everywhere.
Peridot wrote on Sep 9th 2000, 07:02:12 about
is
Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyi occasionally choose is to find something as short or as meaningless as the word. same as the and a
misha gubarev wrote on Jun 6th 2003, 18:36:36 about
is
Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
El Boo wrote on Apr 8th 2005, 17:09:53 about
is
Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
Most people didn't understand what Bill Clinton meant when he said »that depends on what the definition of 'is' is.« The question placed was »Is there a sexual relationship...«
Clinton had to be careful. If he answered »no,« they could get him on the fact that there had been a relationship in the past, even though there may not now »be« a relationship.
If »is« means »currently exists« the answer might have been no, but if you remove the temporal element it could possibly have been yes.
When you're being questioned under oath, you have to be sure of your definitions, otherwise you may later be accused of lying or you might admit something you had no intention of admitting.
| Some random keywords |
will
Hey
Paranoia
male-nipples
historian
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Kännchen
leise
Sachkundige-Dozentinnen
Sylvie
inniglich
|