>NEW: Info to the keyword have | >discuss | >create link 
on May 6th 2003, 21:11:43, Topical68 wrote the following about

have

The classic divide: The haves and have not. What is »had« by the »haves« is not necessarily what is desired by the »have nots«.


   user rating: +22
Can you think about the opposite of »have«? Write down how it works!

Your name:
Your Associativity to »have«:
Do NOT enter anything here:
Do NOT change this input field:
 Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »have« | FAQ | Home Page 
0.0010 (0.0004, 0.0001) sek. –– 46207043