| Amount of texts to »1st« | 26, and there are 25 texts (96.15%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
| Average lenght of texts | 74 Characters |
| Average Rating | 0.115 points, 4 Not rated texts |
| First text | on Mar 28th 2000, 04:54:00 wrote Alvar about 1st |
| Latest text | on Aug 11th 2007, 21:51:27 wrote alrom about 1st |
| Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 4) |
on May 26th 2000, 13:34:05 wrote
on Jul 19th 2001, 00:08:38 wrote
on Oct 15th 2001, 16:11:41 wrote |
1st is highly overrated. I can't understand why people are so hung up on firsts – is it pioneering spirit, simple greed or aggressive competitiveness that prompts this need to be 1st at stuff?
Firsts are good for something, I suppose. Without firsts, there would be no seconds or subsequents, would there?
Anyone remember this rhyme (sort of) from early childhood? In my elementary school, it was often invoked when we were forced to line up for whatever reason. It was most likely created by a clever child who was often stuck in second place.
1st the worst
2nd the best
3rd the dirty princess <-? (I believe this was it. I remember it was seen as a bad thing, somehow even worse than »the worst«. It may have also been »3rd the turd«, but I don't think so)
I'm in favor of skipping the 1st step when possible. It makes the route to the finish all the faster.
| Some random keywords |
bored
Gurgle
wonder
forensics
psychology
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Billionen
Bravmacher
fuck
Drehrestaurant
Mäander
|