>NEW: Info to the keyword music | >discuss | >create link 
on Mar 6th 2002, 22:27:04, Jean-Claude Choul wrote the following about

music

If music is supposed to be »good« for anyone, we are in the presence of two variables (not counting, the relative idea of goodness: how good is good?); first there are so many kinds of music or, in other words, so many things can be said to be music, that »music« all by itself is almost meaningless. You or me, or anyone are even less meaningful than any definition of music, because of their linguistic status as »shifters«. Their meaning is reduced to their reference in a given instance. If someone said to me: »music is good for you«, I would wonder what he is getting at. Military music does not strike me as good either for me or for anyone. Trumpets used to be associated with kings; does it mean that listineng to a trumpet volontary is a royalist choice? Social and musical paradigms shift as much as pronoun reference, over time. Music is what you make of it.


   user rating: +12
Remember that anything you write will be indexed by search engines and eventually draw new users to the Assoziations-Blaster. You will attract just that type of people your writing appeals to.

Your name:
Your Associativity to »music«:
Do NOT enter anything here:
Do NOT change this input field:
 Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »music« | FAQ | Home Page 
0.0022 (0.0014, 0.0004) sek. –– 66845758