Amount of texts to »Polysemy« 9, and there are 9 texts (100.00%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3)
Average lenght of texts 240 Characters
Average Rating 0.556 points, 3 Not rated texts
First text on Mar 11th 2002, 09:59:32 wrote
Jean-Claude Choul about Polysemy
Latest text on Jan 27th 2009, 19:14:33 wrote
el cojones about Polysemy
Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 3)

on Jan 27th 2009, 19:14:24 wrote
el cojones about Polysemy

on Mar 28th 2005, 16:29:38 wrote
angie about Polysemy

on Jan 27th 2009, 19:14:33 wrote
el cojones about Polysemy

Random associativity, rated above-average positively

Texts to »Polysemy«

Jean-Claude Choul wrote on Mar 11th 2002, 10:26:34 about


Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Some words have more potential than others for polysemy or polysemic development. »Etiolate« as compared to »Uxorious«, for instance. This is due in part to their combinatorial possibility with other words in creative sentences (as opposed to standard or cliché uses). But even »uxorious« is bisemic, although the dictionary fails to mark the difference between »being excessively fond of« and »being excessively submissive to« (a wife). The test, as always in semantics and linguistics, is substitution. None of the four senses or »fond« can be construed as equivalent to »submissive«. Polysemic potential can be assimilated with the contextual capacity of a word, and can be seen as the application of a given context to the word in question, in a relationship similar to that of argument and predicate.

Jean-Claude Choul wrote on Mar 11th 2002, 09:59:32 about


Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Polysemy is, according to Webster's Collegiate, the multiplicity of meanings. It is the opposite of monosemy. The word was coined by Michel Bréal, founder of historical semantics, preoccupied, as was his contemporary Antoine Darmesteter, with the evolution of meaning in words. American linguists, often working with utterances, generally speak of lexical ambiguity. But polysemy is a reality, as witnessed by subsenses (usually numbered) in a dictionary entry. Cf. cause, rebellion, rebel (n.& adj.). The vast majority of words are polysemous and, generally speaking, only technical or scientific words are monosemic, at least immediately after being coined or derived. The most abstruse the science or field, the longer monosemy will prevail. Some linguists even suggested that polysemy was paradoxically a sign of meaning depletion, due to frequent uses. Polysemy is especially exploited in poetry and puns.

paxer9999 wrote on Oct 7th 2002, 22:16:48 about


Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

The Polysemy nature of words and/or signs is rooted in the ambiguous and perhaps arbitrary inherent meaning of words and/or signs.

Some random keywords

Created on Nov 8th 2001, 09:24:33 by Candice, contains 4 texts

Created on Mar 10th 2001, 18:53:11 by the old pirate, contains 8 texts

Created on Apr 26th 2000, 08:20:13 by sara the mac, contains 12 texts

Created on Dec 7th 2001, 21:42:22 by [das flederwiesel], contains 10 texts

Created on Oct 30th 2002, 19:20:40 by stormvogel, contains 1 texts

Some random keywords in the german Blaster

Created on Jan 7th 2002, 19:20:37 by Kathrina, contains 17 texts

Created on Jun 10th 2003, 22:44:05 by elfboi, contains 26 texts

Created on Jan 15th 2001, 00:31:59 by doG, contains 11 texts

Created on Nov 6th 2001, 14:19:56 by wire, contains 9 texts

Created on Oct 3rd 2001, 23:16:09 by Wolf, contains 17 texts

Created on Dec 14th 1999, 17:08:15 by button, contains 58 texts

Created on Jan 20th 2013, 10:27:36 by Rita, contains 3 texts

The Assoziations-Blaster is a project by Assoziations-Blaster-Team | Deutsche Statistik | 0.0060 Sec. Ugly smelling email spammers: eat this!