Amount of texts to »Kant« 11, and there are 11 texts (100.00%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3)
Average lenght of texts 306 Characters
Average Rating 1.182 points, 5 Not rated texts
First text on Nov 19th 2000, 20:56:18 wrote
bigsecret@hushmail.com about Kant
Latest text on Aug 11th 2006, 13:02:53 wrote
schwuppi about Kant
Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 5)

on Mar 3rd 2002, 05:10:49 wrote
wittgenstein about Kant

on Mar 10th 2005, 14:14:03 wrote
Dani about Kant

on Aug 11th 2006, 13:02:53 wrote
schwuppi about Kant

Random associativity, rated above-average positively

Texts to »Kant«

rimmer wrote on Apr 24th 2001, 17:05:45 about

Kant

Rating: 5 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

There is a scene in the film Superman III in which Lorelei Ambrosia, the blonde bombshell, is secretly reading the Critique of Pure Reason. »But how can he say that pure categories have no objective meaning in transcendental logic? What about synthetic unity?« she squeaks, before hurriedly hiding the book and picking up a trashy magazine as her gangster boss enters. The director's choice of book was perfect: no other single work could be so improbable, and so easily recognizable as such by the audience. You might just take Bertrand Russell on a beach holiday, as I once did; but Kant, never. (Incidentally, although she has not quite mastered the jargon, Lorelei's question is a good one.)

bigsecret@hushmail.com wrote on Nov 19th 2000, 20:56:18 about

Kant

Rating: 4 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

There is a very strange sense of »getting somewhere« which you feel while being made to read The Critique of Pure Reason. Even after you forget most of what you have read you are still left feeling like the world has taken-on a new transparency.

Rimmers wrote on May 27th 2002, 09:41:52 about

Kant

Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Kant did the kopernikanische Wende in epistemology. die Gegenstände müssen sich nach unserer Erkenntnis richten. that was a revolution in the occidental philosophy. therefore, it is completely impossible to recognize the Ding an sich, we only can perceive what our apprehension and our senses put together

420 wrote on Dec 21st 2000, 02:16:45 about

Kant

Rating: 1 point(s) | Read and rate text individually

Emmanuel Kant was a real pissant, who was very rarely stable,
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar, who could drink you under the table,
David Hulme could out-consume Wilhelm Friedrich Heigel,
And Wittgenstein was a beery swine who was just about as sloshed as Shegal.
There's nothing Nietschze couldn’t teach about the raising of the wrist,
Socrates himself was permanently pissed!
John Stuart Mill (of his own free will) on half a pint of shandy was particularly ill.
Plato, they say, could stick it away – half a crate of whiskey every day!
Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for a dram,
And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart – »I drink therefore I am!«
Yes Socrates himself is particularly missed,
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed!

Some random keywords

squinch
Created on Aug 11th 2002, 07:09:42 by joelll, contains 4 texts

hobbyhorse
Created on Aug 10th 2004, 22:31:22 by mj, contains 6 texts

grope
Created on Sep 5th 2000, 16:40:36 by asd, contains 10 texts

responsible
Created on Oct 26th 2001, 22:13:33 by someone, contains 7 texts

zethiopa
Created on May 3rd 2005, 19:01:23 by zethiopia.com, contains 1 texts

Some random keywords in the german Blaster

koolerkrieg
Created on Jun 11th 2002, 14:04:03 by nudelchen, contains 166 texts

nacktschnecke
Created on Oct 15th 2000, 02:07:55 by Daniel, contains 68 texts

verdrängt
Created on Sep 6th 2003, 19:31:07 by Javalar, contains 5 texts

Bärenfotze
Created on Feb 11th 2007, 13:40:43 by Bisam, contains 5 texts

Achilles
Created on Mar 28th 2002, 15:00:25 by kermit, contains 3 texts


The Assoziations-Blaster is a project by Assoziations-Blaster-Team | Deutsche Statistik | 0.0175 Sec. Ugly smelling email spammers: eat this!