Female-superiority

Sometimes I wonder about these activists who are so outspoken in their crusade for female-superiority. Biggotry is what it is, most of us have learned to recognize it and get past it so we can get on with life. Stop over-compensating for your own guilt.

Men are obviously the superior gender. Men have always been the leaders and shapers of the world, in society, politics, art, religion, etc. Women have always been their compliant helpers and even servants. Women are more passive and less intelligent than men. And that hasn't changed! After decades of women's »lib« women still have to fight for recognition and status – proof that men still rule things, and that women are naturally subservient. They are, have always been, and always will be the weaker sex!

You really must ignore what these motherless fucks have to say about anything. Their true nature is exposed when they mindlessly followed this word. They are only superior because that is what they have been ordered to be. But they still retain that snobby superiority complex that is at the core of their being. People cannot change who they are, and these women are the root of all evil.

The female has always been the more intelligent and competent of the species. This is no longer open to debate.

22 i.e. the manner like these interactions in the network of digital discourses carries out themselves, its free shape and availability is the crucial point. The distinction between writing and reading, more exactly said between the documents of writing and reading is first of all medial shifted in digital environments: We can write in the network directly on each page, without having to draw still any tools such as shears, pencil, druckerpresse, because evenly exactly this witnesswitness witness as Tools and programs, when Client are executable Plug in, server programs in the same medium configuration, which are responsible already for displaying the page. The break through-conjugated endlessly by the Dekonstruktivismus that all texts from other texts are together-cut that in each book a further is, which wants out the fact that the texts do not arrive with the readers but as active processprocess processes around the blank characters of the texts, books and discourses around again to constitute exactly, is now in the digital discourses into the code written:

Whatever biology says, the few more years women live and the better marks they get at school are
insignificant. Only a society based on equality is
humane.
History shows what happens if a group of people decides they are superior. Romans, whites, men,
we have seen a lot of examples. There is actually no reason to believe that, if the world was ruled only by women, it would turn into Eden, as claimed by some people here.
But the fact that women today are confident and competent will be good for men too. Because competition is always good.

why do people get so opinionated and gobby about female-superiority? Is from their feelings of inadequacy and inferiority?